Vanishing American

Comment posted at Guy White

http://guywhite.wordpress.com/2009/06/2 ... ment-11516

June 28, 2009 at 8:36 am Old Atlantic

http://reformjudaismmag.org/_kd/Items/a ... n=ShowItem

http://www.insidevandy.com/drupal/node/939

“In 2002 when the WSJ article was published, Vanderbilt had a Jewish population of 2 percent, a percentage that among top 25 schools was only greater than that of Notre Dame University. It was this fact that led Vanderbilt to focus recruitment efforts towards Jewish high school students.”

Affirmative Action Slicing.

Blacks and Hispanics get affirmative action on the bottom, Asians and Jews get a larger share from the top and that slices whites in the middle. If Jews get 30 percent at Harvard (from above link), Asians get 25 percent (a guess), blacks and Hispanics get 25 combined, then you are at 80 percent, leaving whites 20 percent (or Non Jewish whites, NJ whites).

Slicing divides the country into slicers, blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Jews and the sliced, NJ whites.

Slicing is pushed by all 4 slicing groups and this makes them a coalition on slicing. There are 12 Jewish senators and many Jewish judges and justices. They almost all support slicing is my guess.

Harvard was founded to be a Christian university reflecting the people who found it. Jews created Jerusalem out of nothing, so its fair that it be their city. Euro-whites (to have another name for NJ whites) created Harvard out of nothing. But now its not theirs anymore.

Hypothesis: As Euro white share at Harvard has fallen, Harvard as become more hostile to whites. Moreover, it has promoted Asian entrance to weapons labs, etc. and the transfer of know-how to China. This has cost high paying American jobs. Men’s median wages are the same as in 1973, see p60-273.pdf.

You can look at the grades of the 12 Jewish senators on immigration. They are low, many are F. In cases of one Jewish senator from a state, the Jewish senator’s grades are typically lower than those of the non Jewish senator. In New York, Schumer is 2 letter grades lower than his colleague. These states tend to be low anyhow. But the Jewish senator may pull the other towards him/her.

The Jewish response to Palin. This response is a way to identify which race a person identifies with. Those who viscerally dislike Palin and feel she is alien from them are self identifying them as not identifying with her. This is in part racial. Overall, I think the Jewish reaction to Palin is they feel different than her.

Virgil Goode is another test case. He was against Muslim immigration. But my impression is that the Jewish react to him is revulsion and feeling alien. Goode is a Founding Stock American, who now at Harvard are 10 percent perhaps. Whenever an FSA appears in the news isn’t the main Jewish response negative? James Watson is an FSA. Wasn’t the reaction that way towards him? But Goode and Palin are not as smart as Watson, and are more typical of FSA’s and Eurowhites. The reaction towards them is revulsion, alienation and disgust?

Also the ongoing joke attacks on Palin come from whom? Are Jewish joke writers some of those writing those Palin jokes for Letterman? And if we grant them high IQ then they knew it was Willow the 14 year old who went with Palin to the baseball game in New York. (If Jews want credit for high IQ they have to take responsibility for the consequences of their actions.)

Immigration also harms whites. Slicing plus H-1b plus general immigration have brought whites down. Whites are a minority group now in some prestige universities, etc. Protestant whites are a minority on the US Supreme Court.

The consequences of affirmative action slicing are plain to see. The WASP, the FSA, they are being sliced out of the institutions they founded. Jews are the new verbal elite and they effectively control Harvard because of slicing. They are thus the leader of the slicing coalition. That makes them on the opposite side to whites. Its game theory.

The above is provisional and I reserve the right to amend or withdraw these comments as my thinking changes. I don’t have a settled view on this subject.

==

There are many articles around doing the numbers on this. If people know of them, please post the links here. The links embed automatically, I did nothing but copy and paste and they became live on their own. Another reason to post at the forum.

The following was a follow on comment at Guy White in response to another comment there.

June 28, 2009 at 9:37 am Old Atlantic

I take the point GW is trying to make is that he wants evidence based analysis. The phenomenon of Affirmative Action slicing has been noted by others including Jews like Ron Unz (IQ 214 he says). However, its lacked a name. Moreover, it lacks even a light game theory analysis.

Once we name it and name its parts, we see that slicing is a game in a game theory sense. The players in slicing are blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Jews on one side and non Jewish whites on the other side. Non Jewish whites (I will call just whites for brevity) are on one side. They are being sliced out. If you don’t like slicing, you can call it squeezing.

Jews are the big winner from slicing. They go from 2 percent of the population to the biggest cohesive group of the slicing coalition. Asians are not verbal enough to be leaders. Blacks and Hispanics are at the bottom and so aren’t leaders by definition. Thus Jews end up the huge winner. As the verbal elite, they get the ability to control institutions from slicing.

Slicing is essential to keep whites from stopping general immigration as well as H-1b immigration. Slicing keeps whites from organizing within institutions. Profs at non elite institutions are Ph.D.’s from Harvard, etc. If a person gets a Ph.D. at a lower level school, their chances at a faculty job are very low, and if they are white even lower.

Slicing means whites are afraid for their jobs. So they don’t speak up about slicing or about general immigration. It is an essential part of creating fear in elite whites to keep quiet and not be loyal to non elite whites. This allows immigration to continue.

Slicing and the removal of whites from elite institution control is an essential element of the ethnic cleansing of whites. Since Jews are the leaders of slicing, and Jews end up as the verbal elite in these institutions, Jews are thus the coalition leader of slicing. That makes them the leader of the general ethnic cleansing of whites. This is game theory. This is what Guy White wanted, rational argument based on facts and game theory and social science.

Game theory is the basis of microeconomics more and more. If you look at the top Ph.D. textbooks in microeconomics, they use a lot of game theory to base micro on. If you look at the expansion of econ into social science, it uses game theory.

Results 1 – 63 of 63 from becker-posner-blog.com for Jews

Results 1 – 100 of about 2,300 from volokh.com for Jewish.

If you look at the above two blogs which have a law and economics flavor in both cases, they freely talk about Jews.

http://grades.betterimmigration.com/

There is a map. You can click on states with Jewish and non-Jewish senators and do the comparison.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:J ... s_Senators

Not all are current. I went through the 12, and did notes but those are on a different computer.

You can do the search 12 Jewish senators and get the list.

Its not a matter of Schumer alone. The comparison test of in each state with one Jewish senator, which senator has the lower grade on immigration is a valid test. Its what Guy White is asking for as the basis of debate. So are the stats on Jewish enrollment at Harvard. So is slicing. So is applying game theory to analyze the results. This is Gary Becker (Jewish) type economics if you are a fan of Chicago economics. If not, Marx did it first. If you don’t like Marx, someone else did it before him.

Two more comments at Guy White

game theory site:volokh.com

Results 1 – 100 of about 1,150 from volokh.com for game theory.

game theory site:becker-posner-blog.com

Results 1 – 100 of about 128 from becker-posner-blog.com for game theory.

game theory site:usdoj.gov

Results 1 – 100 of about 365 from usdoj.gov for game theory.

and

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

“game theory” Daubert

Results 1 – 100 of about 1,070 for “game theory” Daubert.

“game theory” Daubert site:.gov

Results 1 – 13 of 13 for “game theory” Daubert site:.gov

Just 13 but those 13 are important.

Daubert is the ruling of the US Supreme court relating to proving scientific theories in presenting evidence in court.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daubert_Standard

The Daubert standard is a legal precedent set in 1993 by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the admissibility of expert witnesses’ testimony during federal legal proceedings. The citation is Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993).

A Daubert motion is a motion, raised before or during trial, to exclude the presentation of unqualified evidence to the jury. This is a special case of motion in limine, usually used to exclude the testimony of an expert witness who has no such expertise or used questionable methods to obtain the information.

# DF]
A Daubert Discipline for Merger Simulation
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat – View as HTML
Feb 16, 2004 … For more than a decade, structural game-theory models have been used to ….. While merger simulation has not been the subject of Daubert …
http://www.ftc.gov/be/daubertdiscipline.pdf – Similar -
by GJ Werden – Cited by 35 – Related articles – All 4 versions
# [PDF]
Unilateral Merger Effects & Economic Models
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat – View as HTML
By late 1980’s Game Theory had replaced … “A Daubert Discipline for Merger. Simulation” … It is possible to ask Daubert-like questions to …
http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/other/040303froeb.pdf – Similar -
More results from http://www.ftc.gov »

# [PDF]
In the Supreme Court of the United States
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat – View as HTML
statistical analysis or game theory or had experience in industrial organizations or as a financial …. admissibility standards of Daubert v. Merrell Dow …
http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2000/0r ... 9.resp.pdf – Similar -

#
Participant presentations and session transcript for November 15
12, then we got a game theory counter-revolution, okay? A …… 12, Daubert standard. Let’s make sure that the plausibility …
http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/hearings/single…/222438.htm – Cached – Similar -
More results from http://www.usdoj.gov »

FTC and USDOJ accept game theory as part of Daubert analysis in economic expert testimony.

Add additional quote from search:

[PDF]
"The State of Antitrust in 2008," Before the Antitrust Section of ...
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
... rigorous economic scholarship based on rigorous game theory .... opinion would pass muster under Daubert and Kumho Tire , but the opinion does not even ...
www3.ftc.gov/speeches/rosch/080509ncbarstateofantitrust.pdf - Similar -

Good job OA, as always!

Guy seems to be somewhat of a polemicist, and it is beyond me why he thinks the American Jewish community legitimately needs him to speak for them or to 'defend' them from anything.

Thanks again for sticking up for US regarding the whole 'higher ed' scam regarding "our" universities.

Anglo-Celtic thanks. I needed some support on this.

Further evidence of the dispossession of the American people from the country they built from hard work. What was the point of all that work just to let it be stolen?